- ARPDAUPosted 4 years ago
- What’s an impressive conversion rate? And other stats updatesPosted 4 years ago
- Your quick guide to metricsPosted 5 years ago
$140 CPM for ad-sponsored games. That’s pretty aggressive.
Long live in-game advertising.
His primary point is that interrupting the player during a game is disruptive, not fun and extremely difficult to track effectiveness. Without effective measurement, advertisers aren’t biting.
WildTangent have switched models. Users get the choice of whether to pay for a game or to watch a 30 second clip from a sponsor. They watch the ad while the game downloads into their browser.
WIld Tangent claim to be getting $140 CPM for this activity. $140 per thousand plays of the ad. That’s a hugely high number. I have to imagine that is not the effective CPM across the whole site, just the best rates they ever achieve, but either way, it’s a fantastic achievement.
I have to agree with them: browser-based games where users can play for free seem to be a great way of drawing a wider market into gaming, and Wild Tangent appear to have created a model that works.
Which is good news for the industry, because their model is replicable, and we can all start finding ways to monetise free browser games.