- ARPDAUPosted 255 days ago
- What’s an impressive conversion rate? And other stats updatesPosted 296 days ago
- Your quick guide to metricsPosted 348 days ago
Activision charging for Pitfall could make sense, But not at 69p
"You know Pitfall! Has IAP, right? They could Peggle to free whenever. Going free is most powerful when you’ve been paid."
Will is, of course, totally right. If you launch with a price – any price – you have a powerful marketing weapon in your arsenal: the decision over when to go free.
- When you go free, people will download your game, in case you change your mind and put the price up again (It works if you just reduce the price too, see Steam sales)
- Bots will automatically pick up the price change, and there are websites and other places where you can alerts about games that go free
- Services like Free App A Day work much better when you were previously free
I can absolutely see why launching as a paid app makes sense. It is easier to drop your price than raise it. It gets the biggest fans to pay a full price that they are happy to pay to get it first before you play with the price to draw in less committed players. The price drop will give the game a secondary marketing boost (see Star Wars: The Old Republic for how this is playing out right now.)
I still would have launched Pitfall at almost any other price point than 69p.