<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Six reasons why $250 million for Playfish is a steal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gamesbrief.com/2009/10/six-reasons-why-250-million-for-playfish-is-a-steal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gamesbrief.com/2009/10/six-reasons-why-250-million-for-playfish-is-a-steal/</link>
	<description>The Business of Games</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:58:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Online Games Guide</title>
		<link>http://www.gamesbrief.com/2009/10/six-reasons-why-250-million-for-playfish-is-a-steal/comment-page-1/#comment-8115</link>
		<dc:creator>Online Games Guide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 12:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gamesbrief.com/2009/10/six-reasons-why-250-million-for-playfish-is-a-steal/#comment-8115</guid>
		<description>Hello!
5 stars for this Web site 
i like this!
thx

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello!<br />
5 stars for this Web site<br />
i like this!<br />
thx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Online Games Guide</title>
		<link>http://www.gamesbrief.com/2009/10/six-reasons-why-250-million-for-playfish-is-a-steal/comment-page-1/#comment-8116</link>
		<dc:creator>Online Games Guide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 12:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gamesbrief.com/2009/10/six-reasons-why-250-million-for-playfish-is-a-steal/#comment-8116</guid>
		<description>Cool Website!
Thx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool Website!<br />
Thx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jurica</title>
		<link>http://www.gamesbrief.com/2009/10/six-reasons-why-250-million-for-playfish-is-a-steal/comment-page-1/#comment-8117</link>
		<dc:creator>Jurica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 12:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gamesbrief.com/2009/10/six-reasons-why-250-million-for-playfish-is-a-steal/#comment-8117</guid>
		<description>Hello!
5 stars for this Web site 
thx
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello!<br />
5 stars for this Web site<br />
thx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 16gb sd card</title>
		<link>http://www.gamesbrief.com/2009/10/six-reasons-why-250-million-for-playfish-is-a-steal/comment-page-1/#comment-4831</link>
		<dc:creator>16gb sd card</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 12:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gamesbrief.com/2009/10/six-reasons-why-250-million-for-playfish-is-a-steal/#comment-4831</guid>
		<description>Nice post. All six reasons are really good but not only this reason the major reason is they are connected with the top social networking site &quot;Facebook&quot; and they got a huge profit with that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post. All six reasons are really good but not only this reason the major reason is they are connected with the top social networking site &#8220;Facebook&#8221; and they got a huge profit with that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EA devours Playfish &#171; Social Game News</title>
		<link>http://www.gamesbrief.com/2009/10/six-reasons-why-250-million-for-playfish-is-a-steal/comment-page-1/#comment-4291</link>
		<dc:creator>EA devours Playfish &#171; Social Game News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gamesbrief.com/2009/10/six-reasons-why-250-million-for-playfish-is-a-steal/#comment-4291</guid>
		<description>[...] more analysis by GamesBrief Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)EA seeps into social games with SporeHe said, She [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more analysis by GamesBrief Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)EA seeps into social games with SporeHe said, She [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T=Machine &#187; So, who&#8217;s going to buy Zynga?</title>
		<link>http://www.gamesbrief.com/2009/10/six-reasons-why-250-million-for-playfish-is-a-steal/comment-page-1/#comment-4261</link>
		<dc:creator>T=Machine &#187; So, who&#8217;s going to buy Zynga?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 08:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gamesbrief.com/2009/10/six-reasons-why-250-million-for-playfish-is-a-steal/#comment-4261</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;ve seen a lot of people from the mainstream industry (i.e. consoles, PC games, handheld etc &#8211; eerything EXCEPT iPhone and Facebook) incredulous, unconvinced it was worth it. This was the case even with the rumoured $250 million valuation from a month ago (c.f. Nicholas Lovell&#8217;s post on that). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;ve seen a lot of people from the mainstream industry (i.e. consoles, PC games, handheld etc &#8211; eerything EXCEPT iPhone and Facebook) incredulous, unconvinced it was worth it. This was the case even with the rumoured $250 million valuation from a month ago (c.f. Nicholas Lovell&#8217;s post on that). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas Lovell</title>
		<link>http://www.gamesbrief.com/2009/10/six-reasons-why-250-million-for-playfish-is-a-steal/comment-page-1/#comment-4357</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas Lovell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 02:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gamesbrief.com/2009/10/six-reasons-why-250-million-for-playfish-is-a-steal/#comment-4357</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s an interesting point. I do think $250 million is a great deal for EA, but I also think that the social games space will get very competitive very quickly, so the VCs might be smart to take the money now.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m still trying to think about Accel&#039;s return, and will come back to that in a later post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#39;s an interesting point. I do think $250 million is a great deal for EA, but I also think that the social games space will get very competitive very quickly, so the VCs might be smart to take the money now.</p>
<p>I&#39;m still trying to think about Accel&#39;s return, and will come back to that in a later post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Bidaux</title>
		<link>http://www.gamesbrief.com/2009/10/six-reasons-why-250-million-for-playfish-is-a-steal/comment-page-1/#comment-4356</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Bidaux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 20:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gamesbrief.com/2009/10/six-reasons-why-250-million-for-playfish-is-a-steal/#comment-4356</guid>
		<description>I agree that number seems like a too-good-to-be-true valuation for EA... All good and valid points. I have a hard time to believe the rumour at the moment as I would imagine Playfish&#039;s VC willing to wait a bit more to make it even more valuable... But hey, they might have not been given a choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that number seems like a too-good-to-be-true valuation for EA&#8230; All good and valid points. I have a hard time to believe the rumour at the moment as I would imagine Playfish&#39;s VC willing to wait a bit more to make it even more valuable&#8230; But hey, they might have not been given a choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deftangel</title>
		<link>http://www.gamesbrief.com/2009/10/six-reasons-why-250-million-for-playfish-is-a-steal/comment-page-1/#comment-4355</link>
		<dc:creator>deftangel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 19:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gamesbrief.com/2009/10/six-reasons-why-250-million-for-playfish-is-a-steal/#comment-4355</guid>
		<description>I think that&#039;s 100% spot on. I&#039;d be interested to see if any analysts agree. Something tells me they won&#039;t as most of them seems to have their heads in the same sand as some of the other larger publishers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that&#39;s 100% spot on. I&#39;d be interested to see if any analysts agree. Something tells me they won&#39;t as most of them seems to have their heads in the same sand as some of the other larger publishers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas Lovell</title>
		<link>http://www.gamesbrief.com/2009/10/six-reasons-why-250-million-for-playfish-is-a-steal/comment-page-1/#comment-3994</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas Lovell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gamesbrief.com/2009/10/six-reasons-why-250-million-for-playfish-is-a-steal/#comment-3994</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s an interesting point. I do think $250 million is a great deal for EA, but I also think that the social games space will get very competitive very quickly, so the VCs might be smart to take the money now.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m still trying to think about Accel&#039;s return, and will come back to that in a later post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#39;s an interesting point. I do think $250 million is a great deal for EA, but I also think that the social games space will get very competitive very quickly, so the VCs might be smart to take the money now.</p>
<p>I&#39;m still trying to think about Accel&#39;s return, and will come back to that in a later post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

